you basically said multiple times that you wanted dude to get hit by a train so that it wouldn't be a disney movie as if:

a. Disney movies are all bad/sugary
b. Dude getting hit by a train made any sense whatsoever.

You also said the last scene has nothing to do with the money and that it should have been changed to piss off a segment of viewers which is:

a. stupid because if you don't get that it's not about the money after the first half-hour of the movie you're an idiot.

b. dumb because they basically hit you over the head MULTIPLE times throughout the movie that it's not about the money.

c. nonsensical because if you didn't get that it wasn't about the money in the end, how does cutting that scene out transmit the message that it's not about the money? It doesn't. It's not like dude was making it rain over even excited that he won. He left and sat in a dirty ass train station afterwards. I just leaves a loose thread which in and of itself doesn't make the movie any better.

______________________________________________________________________________

"There's a fine line between persistence and foolishness..."
-unknown

"To Each His Reach"
-George Clinton