well yeah, one equals the other, the movie is based on the comic book and miller is involved in both, so my beef is with both, i see them as one entity.

edit: to summarise my previous posts, i don't see why stories that have survived thousands of years and hundreds of reprints need to be changed by oliver stone (or anyone else) to make them better.

in the year 5000 i doubt any hollywood scripts will be held up as classic pieces of literature. if it ain't broke... you know the rest