7405, Not so sure - Posted by Sight and Sound, Fri Sep-19-03 09:36 AM
>Beckinsale, on the other hand, is not exotic at all. Even if >she were to stick to the stage or try to only do British >films, there's nothing about her that stands out. She's a >decent actress, but there's not enough work in British film >to sustain just a group of indistiguisible actress. If she >wants to do any kind of substantial work, she needs to "go >Hollywood."
I do concur that the British film industry isn't in the best shape presently, but to go back to an earlier reference in Charlotte Rampling - you think Beckinsale would take on a role like "The Night Porter" right now? I think that the platitudes she heaps on about aspiring to great performances will be dictated by the material (of which there's considerably more - not good, however - in Hollywood) - and she hasn't convinced me that she's willing to adhere to what she claims to believe (her selections of roles anyway)...
>Incidentally, I have different expectations for Underworld. >Not that it's going to be a great movie, but it looks like >good clean fun. And I think it will be a boost for KB's >career.
Maybe RE - most reviews I've seen are pretty dismissive and I just view it as another entry of entertainment (for which there's a time and place), but definitely nothing more than that... It may embellish her career, but towards roles like the aforementioned "Night Porter," methinks not...
|