>I have a following, and I can't disappoint my fans on
>here(str8 up).
>
Come now son.. how you gonna' have a 'following' on a message board..?
& even if you did, how could that make what you say relevant?

>
>When I was a kid, the vehicle was SECONDARY(distantly) to the
>character. All I really knew is that some cats drove, some
>cats flew.
>What really mattered was how the niggas talked, interacted,
>their
>personalities, shit like that.
>
>The vehicles weren't *irrelevant* but you guys acting like
>that shit
>completely redefines everything are just being dorky.

Ok so apparently you didn't really pay much attention to how the characters were & how the vehicles reflected the certain characters emotions & how they interacted with each other. IE: you just proved my point.

>
>>But here in Hollywood cash rules & since GM hasn't made a
>>profit in oh over 20+ quarters they had to offer Bay prolly
>10
>>mill just to get thier cars in the new TF. So all of our
>>dreams of having a somewhat faithful port over get washed
>away
>>by cash.
>
>WHO.GIVES. A.MOTHER.FUCK!!!

Whooooaaa... settle down there skimpy. The all caps thing...


>The question is this one:
>
>WILL THE MOTHERFUCKING MOVIE BE ENTERTAINING, WELL WRITTEN,
>COHERENT, and EXCITING

I'm sure it'll be well written. I'm sure it'll be exciting. I'm sure it'll be coherent. The thing is that this movie *like all other Bay films* is going to be like a platinum blonde with big ol' boobies & a banging body: she's great to look at but there's really no substance there...

>The motherfucking VENOM looked GREAT in Spiderman 3!!

You must be a fan of the Larson Venom & not the McFarlane Venom.
Figures...

>>Doing something different is NOT always 'right'.
>
>Who the fuck said that?

The producers of this movie who brainwashed you into thinking that this 'different' approach is 'cool'.

>
>>& I got laid last night.
>
>
>No, you didn't.

Actaully I did.

>>Your lame.
>
>Not quite.

Yeah huh.