Go back to previous topic
Forum namePass The Popcorn Archives
Topic subject^^^Dis Latte LOST^^^
Topic URLhttp://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=23&topic_id=28110&mesg_id=28213
28213, ^^^Dis Latte LOST^^^
Posted by Orbit_Established, Tue Aug-23-05 10:00 AM
Yes you did.

Like I said, your artsy-fartsiness wrote checks that your intellect can't cash.

Its been amusing.

Okay.

*TURNS ON THUG_ORBIT*

>haven't you been paying attention? these are both ways of
>extending a basic metaphor that the author doesn't elaborate
>for us. if you MUST elaborate. the basic point is "different
>people have different moral codes"

NO YOU DUMBASS. THEY ARE MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE!!!

EITHER ONE IS RIGHT OR THE OTHER.

YOU AND THE OTHER LATTE'S HAVE GONE WAAAAAAAAYYYYY OUT OF YOUR WAY TO SEARCH FOR MEANING IN SOMETHING THAT ISN'T THAT FUCKING DEEP!!!!

EVERY TIME I REFUTE ONE VIEW, YOU TURN AROUND AND ADOPT ANOTHER!!!

PICK A FUCKING ARGUMENT!!!!

BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!


>anyway, after you made that point, i said I could easily
>reframe the debate to take account of that point, because it's
>already been done in an essay. You think i'm lying about the
>essay? I can go and find out the author and publication RIGHT
>NOW, in fact there's AT LEAST TWO essays that use the idea,
>and they're on the Pulp Fiction dvd and they appeared in big
>periodicals like the NY Times. But you can take my word for
>it, because i'm not dishonest

THAN WHY DID YOU USE MY EXACT WORDS "light" and "heavy" and their "subjective interpretation!!!"THE ESSAYS YOU DISCUSSED BEFORE DID NOT USE THOSE EXACT WORDS and make that EXACT ARGUMENT!!!!

"ORBIT_ESTABLISHED' MADE THAT EXACT ARGUMENT, THAT SHAT ON SOMETHING YOU HAD SAID, AND THEN ALL OF A SUDDEN YOU ADOPTED IT AND TALKED ABOUT "I READ IT IN AN ESSAY." YOU SIMPLY DIDN'T THINK I'D BE READING YOUR OTHER POSTS, BUT I FOUND AND EXPOSED IT!!

YOU ARE SUCH A FRAUD!!!!


>that's why I said "necessarily"
>obviously they do affect peoples views
>but the point would be that ULTIMATELY the connections are
>arbitrary
>that's what makes it an original point worth making, and not
>stating the fucking obvious

What?

MAKE-A-FUCKING-POINT!!!!

WHICH METAPHOR IS TARANTINO USING!!!

WHAT METAPHOR DO YOU SEE AS BEING MOST LIKELY!!!!

YOU CAN'T JUST SUGGEST EVERY SINGLE POSSIBLE PERMUMATION AND ASSUME THAT PERHAPS TARANTINO'S METAPHOR APPLIED TO EVERY SINGLE PERSON ON EARTH WITH A DIFFERENT SPIN ON THE SCENE!!!!

ULTIMATELY ITS A MOVIE, WITH A WRITER AND A DIRECTOR WHO ACTUALLY WAS TRYING TO COMMUNICATE A POINT WITH THE SCENE!!!!!

YOU COME UP WITH ALL SORTS OF WRONG ASS CONCLUSIONS THAN WHEN YOU GET CALLED OUT ON THEM YOU SAY:

"Different people interpret things differently"

COPOUT!!!!!

IF YOU ARE WRONG, YOU ARE WRONG!!!!!

THE METRIC/IMPERIAL DISCOURSE HAD NOTHING, AT ALL, TO DO WITH THE CRIMINAL UNDERWORLD'S EMBRACE OF THE METRIC SYSTEM!!!!!!!

EITHER THE IMPERIAL/METRIC DISCOURSE HAD TO DO WITH HOW MORALS *ARE* SUBJECTIVE *OR* HOW THEY *AREN'T* SUBJECTIVE. TAKE A FUCKING STAND AND STOP BACKPEDDLING!!!!

>it's so funny watching you scramble to make your triumphant
>proclamations of stupidity, IN CAPITAL LETTERS

*THUG_ORBIT OFF*

Its actually dope. That's why they call me the "five tool poster." I can sling dirt at cats. I can debate cats intellectually. I can make an academic argument in a third-grade tone. I can expose your logical fallacies, and talk about how fat yo momma is. All in a single post.

I'm the man.

>but it's also a waste of time, so i'm not responding anymore

^^^Dis Latte Admits Defeat^^^^


----------------------------

O_E: Your Super-Ego's Favorite Poster.

"Any fighter that I face, I say prayers for them every night and that he and I live to fight another day."

(C) Floyd Mayweather Jr.