116628, this wasn't Nolan's work and LOL @ comparing one movie to a trilogy Posted by Garhart Poppwell, Sat Jun-15-13 11:59 PM
>nor better than the Batman trilogy but this was a good movie, >it showed a lot of character development and the plot was >engaging, at times surprising, with what seems like are >multiple false-endings. > >the krypton and space scenes reminded me a lot of how the >recent Star Trek movies were shot stylistically. i felt like i >had seen this movie before because of this. > >henry cavill was perfect for this role. amy adams wasn't bad, >i know a lot of ppl didn't think she did much for the movie. >they said they were trying to make this lois lane smarter with >substance which is fine but they didn't do a great job winning >us over with her. > >i really liked russell crowe as jor-el a lot, i hope he's >somehow involved in the sequel (despite his fate). > >saw this in 3D, which was nice but not a huge enhancement to >the viewing experience, in case anyone was considering this >route. i couldve done without it. >
|