>what was wrong with what I said about the movie, man? I
>understand Team Redford got their feelings hurt over a dumb
>throwaway comment about his personal appearance. Fine.
>Looking past that, he wasn't great in the movie, mostly
>because the script didn't give him much to work with, and his
>role as the unexpected bad guy was pretty heavily telegraphed
>from the beginning (even more so than Jeff Bridges character
>in IM1).
>
>so what else are you taking such offense with? the rest is
>just personal opinion. if you disagree, let's discuss it.
>that's how film critique outside of fanboy-ism works.
>
>I enjoyed the movie. It just was far from perfect. And it's
>bizarre to me that, to other people, that translates to "hated
>it."