Go back to previous topic
Forum namePass The Popcorn Archives
Topic subjectRE: io9: All of Your Lingering Prometheus Questions, Answered!
Topic URLhttp://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=23&topic_id=106775&mesg_id=107004
107004, RE: io9: All of Your Lingering Prometheus Questions, Answered!
Posted by Benedict the Moor, Mon Jun-11-12 04:59 PM
Aight, I'ma go ahead out of the kindness of my heart and translate all this shit for ya'll.

>Why is Holloway such a jerk to David?
>
>Logan Marshall-Green: It's something that I wanted to
>implement and I really, really liked it. Michael and I had a
>blast with it. It's something I haven't seen in science
>fiction, which is a sense of racism or bigotry towards
>androids and synthetic life.

wtf? how about in the second movie of the series, ALIENS. Ripley is repulsed by Bishop after finding out he's an android. How about iRobot, Terminator, Blade Runner (WHAT THE ENTIRE MOVIE WAS BASED ON), Star Wars "We don't serve their kind here" ... etc, etc. This is literally one of the dumbest statements ever made.


>What was David's motivation for "infecting" Holloway with
>black goop?
>
>Damon Lindelof: I say that the short answer is: That's his
>programming. In the scene preceding him doing that, he is
>talking to Weyland (although we don't know it at the time) and
>he's telling Weyland that this is a bust. That they haven't
>found anything on this mission other than the stuff in the
>vials. And Weyland presumably says to him, "Well, what's in
>the vials?" And David would say, "I'm not entirely sure, we'll
>have to run some experiments." And Weyland would say, "What
>would happen if you put it in inside a person?" And David
>would say, "I don't know, I'll go find out." He doesn't know
>that he's poisoning Holloway, he asks Holloway, "What would
>you be willing to do to get the answers to your questions?"
>Holloway says, "Anything and everything." And that basically
>overrides whatever ethical programming David is mandated by,
> to spike his drink.

^^^Translation: "blah blah blah... cuz he was programmed to!" great, thanks for that revealing bit of info. So basically the robot coerced the human against his will by tricking him. what a TERRIBLE explanation.



>What is Lindelof's obsession with rich old men who ruin their
>kids lives?
>
>Lindelof: Well, I will say that I haven't had any experience
>with rich old men who have ruined my life. Some less rich old
>men who have been wonderful role models. But I think that the
>Keynesian "rich old man with nefarious intent" is a classic
>character in both regular fiction and both straight up genre.
>And just too delicious to resist.

^^^ Translation: "I don't know but thought it would be cool to put it in the script."

>On that same note, we've seen Lindelof tackle childbirth
>before specifically women losing the ability to have children
>or having it bastardized in some way in Lost. Why was it
>important to weave human pregnancy into Prometheus?
>
>Lindelof: I think hardwired into the original Alien is this
>idea of fertility. This idea of, for lack of a better way of
>looking at it, the sperm and the egg need each other to in
>order to form a new life. And in this gestational construct,
>the human being is the egg and the sperm is represented (in
>the original Alien) by a face hugger. And in Prometheus it's
>represented in a different way. I just feel like the idea of
>taking these three generations of creators (so the Engineers
>who created us, then us, and our creation synthetic human
>beings the robot David). We're going to take those three
>generations, we're gonna lock them in a room together, we're
>gonna watch them have sex with each other. And then we're
>going to see what comes out. That was the experiment that
>Prometheus was running. And whether it was successful or
>whether it was a failure, it sure was fun to write.

^^^ last sentence says it all... "WHETHER OR NOT IT WAS SUCCESSFUL, I WAS GONNA WRITE THE SHIT ANYWAY." So basically he's saying I don't give a fuck if this works or not, I just felt like throwing it in there so i did.

>Have they actually mapped out a motivation for the Engineers,
>is it supposed to remain ambiguous? Will they be mysterious
>forever, or can we figure them out if we pay enough attention?
>Was it deliberate or if they felt like they offered enough
>hints to the dedicated viewer, where we never really know what
>the advanced aliens wanted?
>
>Lindelof: Ridley definitely had very specific answers to those
>questions and we talked a lot about how we wanted to put those
>answers into Prometheus. And whether or not we wanted to hold
>any of them back. It's a little bit obnoxious to say, "well if
>you like this movie, we'll give that stuff to you in the
>sequel." So you have to have a fair shot at being able to
>extrapolate based on the information in this movie. But I do
>feel like, embedded in this movie are the fundamental ideas
>behind why it is the Engineers would want to wipe us out. If
>that's the question that you're asking. The movie asks the
>question, were we created by these beings? And it answers that
>question very definitively. But in the wake of that answer
>there's a new question, which is, they created us but now they
>want to destroy us, why did they change their minds? That's
>the question that Shaw is asking at the end of this movie, the
>one that she wants answered. I do think that there are a lot
>of hints in this movie that we give you quite and educated
>guess as to why. But obviously not to the detriment of what
>Shaw might find when she goes to talk to these things
>herself.

^^^ Translation "Blah blah blah... I'm gonna answer your question by rewording it and asking you the same thing only use 30 sentences to do so. I'm an awesome guy!"

>Is Prometheus anti-science? >earlier in our spoiler free interview with Lindelof, but here
>is his spoiler filled response.]

>Do the aliens want us to visit them?
>
>In an interview with IGN, this question is addressed — but
>Lindelof only answers with more questions.
>
>Lindelof: That's an excellent question and one that I'm not
>going to answer. But I will say that there's something
>fascinating about humanity where we perceive it as an
>invitation. You look at a cave wall, there's somebody pointing
>at some distant planets, and one interpretation is "This is
>where we come from" another is "We want you to come here."
>Where are we drawing that from? I think another thing that's
>interesting about the system that they visit is that the moon
>the land on in Prometheus is LV 223. And we know LV 426 is
>where the action takes place in Alien, so are they even in the
>right place? And how close are they to the place that these
>aliens on cave walls were directing them. Were they just
>extrapolating "This is the system that has the sun with the
>sustainable life." So there's a lot of guesswork. There's a
>small line in the movie where David and Holloway are talking
>about David's deconstruction of the language based on
>Holloway's thesis, and he says "If your thesis is correct" and
>Holloway says "If it's correct?" and David says "That's why
>they call it a thesis Doctor." And the reason we threw that in
>there is that we're dealing with a highly hypothetical area in
>terms of who these beings are, what, if any invitation they
>issued, and who is responsible for making those cave
>paintings. And did something happen in between when those cave
>paintings were made — tens of thousands of years ago — and our
>arrival now, in 2093, 2,000 years after these things have
>perished. Did something happen in the intermediate period that
>we should be thinking about?

^^^Translation: "Blah blah blah... i'm gonna reword your question AGAIN and then come up with 10 irrelevant questions of my own, all while not answering the initial question whatsoever. I'm a cool dude!

>What is David saying to the engineers?
>
>MTV News got this answer as part of a lengthy email exchange
>with Lindeloff, which also reveals whether Vickers is a robot
>or not.
>
>When David communicates with one of the Engineers late in the
>film, what the hell does he say to get them so angry? Did you
>actually script what that dialogue would have been in our
>language?
>
>Yes. David's dialogue with the Engineer has an English
>translation, but Ridley felt very strongly about not
>subtitling it. I spoke at length about this on my DVD
>commentary

^^^Translation: "We don't know wtf that nigga said, we just wanted him to say something before goon albino decapitated him."


And there you have it... Lingering questions answered!