I've been a Bay fan for forever, this ain't new.


>lol. He makes shitty movies who's only redeeming values are
>their action pieces. The problem is that there are plenty of
>action movies that have as good/better set pieces,  ALONG with
>other things that actually make up like a movie like plot or
>characters. If action pieces were all you needed then the last
>two Matrix movies would be classics just for the highway scene
>alone.

see this isn't true. while some of the movies are shit (transformers 2, pearl harbor), others are great (bad boys 1, the island) with proper tension and pacing that allows for great action sequences.
>
>Something like the last Fast and Furious show you why his
>movies suck in comparison.  Mindnumbingly awesome scenes, and
>when shit wasn't getting blown up/destroyed comedy that wasnt
>delivered by racist robots and characters with actual charisma
>riffing off of each other like a buddy cop film...not a pudgy
>pretty boy and his car.

no. Fast and the Furious proves that people don't understand what makes a good action movie. the last flick was completely useless because none of the sequences made any sense at all. you could compare it to bad boys 2 and everything that happened in cuba, but the stuff that happened before that was actually plot-supported.


>
>Crank series>>>>Transformers trilogy


http://card.mygamercard.net/lastgame/rjcc.png

www.engadgethd.com - the other stuff i'm looking at