106387, not necessary Posted by Beamer6178, Fri Aug-17-12 03:52 PM
>>That post was legit, I disagreed with some things agreed >with >>others, took away different things from the movie, and even >>drew out things that were discussed by a lot of people even >if >>you didn't mention them... > >Unfortunately, don't remember the movie anymore, because it >didn't have anything worthy of being remembered. And I >wouldn't watch it again if you paid me 50 dollars. > >So I'm going to have to dig DEEEP into my memory/care to >dig up enough to intelligently correspond
it's not easy to remember much about a movie you didn't enjoy. just upholding my end since i said i'd get back, would have liked it to have been sooner but that's life. to your credit, it was a legit, rational discussion that many could (and probably should) have replied to in similar fashion. not sure why they didn't.
|