106302, your inability to read is harmful Posted by Beamer6178, Thu Jul-26-12 11:41 AM
>You can't bring up the nonsensical 500 posts argument, why is that nonsensical? any way you slice it, it evokes strong feelings from people. did you miss THAT point?
>add >that you don't even know what you think of the film, and then >act like it's someone else's blame for the lack of discussion >in this post. who said i was blaming anyone? notice i've said almost nothing about the movie itself in my previous posts.
>I'll give you that OE can't complain too much >either about the level of discourse since he posted so many >simply "LOL" posts but neither side has been exchanging ideas >in this post. yet and still they've gone halfway to diamond "not exchanging anything" and that's funny to me. sorry you were so offended by me pointing that out
>If you want an authentic discourse respond to OE's post or one >of his many posts where he explains his problems with the >films. perhaps the part where i said I'LL CHECK IN AFTER MY SECOND SCREENING escaped you.
|