Go back to previous topic
Forum namePass The Popcorn Archives
Topic subjecthttp://goo.gl/k9oBR
Topic URLhttp://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=23&topic_id=101141&mesg_id=101214
101214, http://goo.gl/k9oBR
Posted by Orbit_Established, Thu Jan-19-12 05:43 PM

http://goo.gl/k9oBR

You set 'em up. I knock 'em down.


>Note how white people (and every other kind of people) DID get
>tired of The Godfather trilogy, the Star Wars trilogy, the
>Back to the Future trilogy, the Matrix trilogy, the Saw
>series, the Jaws sequels, the Indiana Jones series, and the
>list goes on.


Now you're just lying and make shit up.

Not to mention that this is an automatic L because
those movies are TRILOGIES

The ones I described are INDIVIDUAL MOVIES and
the fact that you keep conflating them further
proves my point:

You lumping them takes away from their specific
nuances and individuality...which is part of what
is racist. The three films had completely different
stories, themes, morals. Other than being Chinese
and featuring some martial arts, they were almost
nothing alike.


>Oh, and the FIRST in pretty much each of those
>cases is considered a CLASSIC (except for Saw.)

LMAO!


*ahem*

Empire (the second) is universally considered the best
in the Star Wars trilogy

Raiders and Temple of Doom are considered the best
in Indy (Temple to most people, which is part 2)

The first Back 2 the Future was considered the best

Jaws is obvious because the Jaws 2 was only made
cuz part 1 made bread, wasn't really a true sequel


So you're mish-mashing the examples and ruining your
dumbass point even further


>In each and every single one of those cases, the THIRD is
>considered the WORST, or in the case of Indiana Jones, the
>FOURTH is considered the worst, or in the case of SAW, they
>get considered shittier and shittier as they go. It's almost
>universally accepted when dealing in sequels and franchises
>that the FIRST is usually the BEST and interest generally
>declines over time.

I already disproved that one.

And the films I discussed weren't even a trilogy,
so auto L for you

White people lumped them together as a trilogy because
they don't care for the nuances of Chinese films and
culture


This is too easy for me.



>Many people call Casino a lackluster retread of Goodfellas in
>that it smacks of been-there-done-that. Fuck that though -
>people who say that shit are really just attempting to hide
>the fact that they're sick and tired of those goddamn
>grease-ball Italians.

That's because Casino wasn't that great.

Note that white people didn't criticize 'The Sopranos'.
White people loved it because, for the most part, it was
good. Nobody was tired of that shit.


Next.




----------------------------

Young Broadway Star Urgently Needs a Bone Marrow Donor. Is it you? http://MatchShannon.com/







O_E: "Acts like an asshole and posts with imperial disdain"




"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "