but if you're going to push a negative review...make it at LEAST plausible

the latest negative reviewer (from NY of course), for instance posted this:

"Unlike Nicholson’s multileveled characterization, Ledger reduces The Joker to one-note ham-acting and trite symbolism. If you fell for the evil-versus-evil antagonism of There Will Be Blood, then The Dark Knight should be the movie of your wretched dreams."

http://www.nypress.com/21/29/film/ArmondWhite.cfm




or..

"Tim Burton knew how to have fun with Batman rather than turning it into plodding, puffed-up kitsch mistaking itself for profound psycho noir that the source material won’t support. As Hellboy 2 amply illustrates, there’s nothing wrong with fun — but there’s none to be had here. "

http://jurgenfauth.com/2008/07/16/the-dark-knight/


or..

"But the psychological twists in The Dark Knight—especially the transformation of Dent into “Two-Face”—are baffling as drama. They play as if they’d been penned by Oxford philosophy majors trying to tone up a piece of American pop"

http://nymag.com/movies/reviews/48514/