>>rottentaomatoes kills your entire argument
>
>How? Because 1000+ opinions are worth more to me (and any
>reasonable person) than yours?
>

1000+ tarantino fanboys are as worthless as yours



>
>>and reveals your fanboy zeal that you think you are somehow
>>concealing.
>
>I get it now, anyone who likes anything is a fanboy and can
>thus be ignored. How simple your world must be.
>

anyone who is agitated and cites rottentomatoes to justify a sh*tbag movie by Tarantino is.

you wearing the shoe Fred Astaire.

>
>>>Second, it's ridiculous to think that the entire
>>>rottentomatoes site is composed of QT fanboys.
>>>
>>
>>mostly
>
>^^^ delusional

you are, yes

>
>
>>>>again, your reaction is the all evidence that is needed.
>>>
>>>Again, you clearly don't know what evidence means. Sorry,
>>but
>>>neither my single opinion nor your single opinion is much
>>>"evidence" for anything.
>>>
>>>However, the compiled ratings of 186 critics and 1048 users
>>>for Grindhouse (or 31 and 543 for Death Proof alone) DOES
>>>count as evidence.
>>
>>rottentaomatoes kills your entire argument
>>
>>and reveals your fanboy zeal that you think you are somehow
>>concealing.
>
>Repetition of shitty arguments doesn't make them stronger. Go
>ahead and get the last word (which is sure to be full of shit
>too), I'm done with you anyway.

rottentomatoes as resource doesn't make your argument stronger or give it any validity. in fact, it kills it.


i'm right

and your face is red because of it.

plea cop away, fanboy.