>>the fact is that wealthy people have more avenues to sex >information and birth control than than poor.
>
>i disagree
>as stated prior there are numerous
>free clinics for inner city
>youth that offer the SAME
>information, planned parent hood to
>be exact..if anything i would
>say as far as knowledge
>is concerned BOTH sides of
>the coin are fairly ignorant
>and fairly knowledgable about information
>pertaining to conception, contraception and
>the like...
>
there's a major difference between going to planned parenthood and free clinics than to going to your own private physician. also, while pregnancy prevention is stressed by parents regardless of social class, a disportionant number of upper class make it a priority. (reasons: shame on the family, etc.,) the clinics are nice but a lot of young brothas and sistas make the choice to visit these clinics rather than be sent there by their parents.

>a "rich" friend of mine told
>me that if i dousch
>after sex i won't get
>pregnant...a "poor" friend told me
>if i get that "pill"
>and take it within a
>matter of three days i
>won't get pregnant...
>
>do these two people speak for
>their entire class?
>
>NO...
>
nobody ever suggested that wealth = intelligence. i simply said that being wealthy affords an access to more effective forms of birth control and information. for example: how many of your "rich friends" are using the norplant?

>point is these misconceptions and ideas
>run rampid amongst people of
>all ages, races, different social
>classes etc...
>
no argument here.

>THIS is what shapes the mind
>set and ignites the product
>of certain things...
>NOT race, or social class..
>
so, the tuskeegee experiments weren't based on race? you might wanna think about that one.

>people love to go off on
>tangents and create "realities" that's
>limited to a "certain" group
>and totally ignore the "possibility"
>that the SAME things go
>on else where...
>
so true.
>this is just a general statement..peace
>
as is mine. no harm done. peace