>>Hebrews 1:3.. still waiting for some one to address that God
>>is one hUPOSTASIS (being) and Jesus is the
>>representation/reproduction/copy of that being. Thus
>>resulting, from basic math, 2 beings.
>
>..., that is, unless you happen to be an Omnipotent,
>Omnicient, Omnibenevolent Being who, by definition, cannot
>be reduced to human conceptualization and simple
>mathematics. I'll assume your definition of hUPOSTASIS, in
>this particular text (since there are three or four usages),
>is something along the lines of God's "essense"... um..
>what's your argument again?
>
>In Hebrews 1:10, God says this (and the author--I'm just
>guessing here--believes it) in reference to Jesus:
>
>"At the beginning, O Lord, you established the earth, and
>the heavens are the works of your hands."
>
>What could possibly be more clear regarding the christology
>of the author? peace,


I would be happy to engage you on Hebrews 1:10, but you have not engaged verse 3. Let us go chronologically shall we? Hebrews 1:3 defines God as a being (hUPOSTASIS) and Jesus as the CARAKTHR of that being. Jesus is thus not that hUPOSTASIS but the CARAKTHR of that hUPOSTASIS. That means Jesus is not the same being as God. If you have any questions on the definition of CARAKTHR or hUPOSTASIS at Hebrews 1:3, I suggest you reference BDAG. If you don't have a copy I'll be happy to provide the complete quotes.

Now, will you please enage my point instead of trying to side-step the issue.