>Are you gonna say that because there is
>something in nature that we don't completly understand, that
>it must be proof of a creator or some higher power.

I'm not ruling out that there's a creator, but it could just as easily be a scientist in a laboratory as it could be YHWH. I'm just suspicious when someone who has proselytized in other posts now claims he's only interested in proving a creator -- ANY creator -- exists but isn't concerned about who it is.