>the creator is unchanging and does not need to change
>because he is the creator.

great circular logic there. Especially odd is that ya'll keep saying the "creator" doesn't change, yet there was apparently a moment where there was no universe, followed by a moment where there was. Sounds like a big ass change to me. I'm also trying to figure out why whether something changes or not makes it qualify as "god" anyway...

think outside the realm of
>physics, obviously the creator of the universe would not be
>bound by our theories on physics but would have created
>those same theories to suit his needs.

well yeah, but do we have any evidence of all of this? That's why discussing the supernatural ends up being pretty meaningless, because there's no "rules" to supernatural explanations. The usual god explanation is just as valid as the great leprechaun explanation.

--


and and shit

"I have to say that even though I have absolutely no faith whatsoever in humanity in any other area, I have the utmost confidence in our ability to kill shit."