>
>How would Bush and Co respond to a chemical or bio attack on
>US troops? Or on American interests? Nukes do not seem too
>far-fetched to me, especially considering Rumsfield's
>insistence that the US is willing to use them in response to
>WMD's launched on US forces. Either way, response to WMD's
>against America would be fierce and detrimental to people of
>Iraq, and consequently, to the image of America after
>zealously catalyzing such a disaster.
>

Hold up... Didn't all U.N. backed countries sign the treaty that NOONE would possess NUKES, including AMERIKKKA ???? So, if RUMSFELD said we have NUKES, why hasn't anyone inspected AMERIKKKA ???? Just a small question ...

And anotha thang, when is Canada suppose to inspect us ??? I can't wait to see this shit ...