Go back to previous topic
Forum nameOkay Activist Archives
Topic subjectRE: For the most part they probably are
Topic URLhttp://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=22&topic_id=5257&mesg_id=5283
5283, RE: For the most part they probably are
Posted by Aquaman, Wed Apr-09-03 05:25 AM
(-for one any practice of polyagomy is not allowed anywhere in the Bible under the Mosiac law. If I'm not mistaken, isn't it alright for men to have 4 or so wives in the Qu'ran?)

Um, Moses had many wives... so did Abraham... Noah... blah, blah... so this isn't true.

(Some of the prophets and kings in Israel had more than one wife (Solomon had over 700) but I don't thihnk this act was *accepted* but tolerated.)

Um, not true.

(-Which son of Abraham is the "golden child" (Ishmael vs. Issac)
which I think in some ways begins to take on an obvious racial tone.
-I could be wrong, but I think the law against pork (and other supersticious practices) is taken away in the NT.)

Superstitious? Not so... 'hooved animals are not to be eaten'...
more than just pork. Not superstitious... just healthy.

(-Original sin

-How to get favor with God/get into heaven (atonement vs. good works).)

Then there's the biggest difference - the life and times of Yeshua Ben Yosef AKA Jesus The Christ AKA Iesus AKA Prophet Isa.
Now yall know I don't believe in any such concept as as "trinity" and believe only The Father (who I gues is the same as Allah) is God, but the Qu'ran does not support the atonement and resurrection.))

True indeed... cause he was a prophet... Phoenix fused into reality anyone?