>you say things like "you obviously didn't read the article",
>but when you realize that the article doesn't support the
>conclusions that you claim it does, you switch the blame to
>the author. Classy. If you don't understand this, don't post
>it and then claim that other people aren't getting it just
>because they're actually reading it and not taking the
>interpretation that you want 'em to.

wtf are you talking about? when did i ever state anything beyond what the article said?