>Fossils don't exactly just pop up out of the ground by
>themselves y'know. It's lucky when we find some, and we
>can't go digging everything up just to prove to you how
>everything evolved.


Response: Excuses, excuses. There should millions of those things everywhere. The fact that you can't find any should show you something.

It is very lucky when a fossil does
>survive millions of years, but no, we're not finding enough
>to make you happy. Of course it's based on inference,
>compiling a complete fossil record would probably be
>impossible, given the vast number of species that died
>without leaving their skeleton in a place that leads to
>fossilization.

Response: Yep, if you say so.
>>
>
>>Some other problems for evolutionist is explaining how the
>>conscience,will and emotion evolved.
>Take that to the Lewis post. Seriously. Conscience and will
>are social constructs that we're fortunate enough to have
>and be able to debate because our brains are so damn
>evolved.

Response: You call this an arguement? And what excately did our minds evolve from? And tell me the process.

Emotion exists in species beyond just humans. Part
>of it is survival instinct, but we've managed to develop a
>lot of different shades of it because we have the luxury of
>doing that, and because our brains and language capacity are
>quite evolved.

Response: So why are'nt animals and other species persons? Why don't they respond as humans do?
>
>Well maybe it didn't used to hit with such a force? Did you
>ever think of that?

Response: Rolling my eyes.
>
>Yeah, and I bet a lot of beetles died along the way.
>Evolution has produced many specialized animals, plants,
>insects, any living thing, you could list 'em all day, but
>you're not really doing anything to disprove them,
>scientifically.

Response: Define science.