Man, I see your point... but don't you see that it's missing the point as well??

Even if they could create life... that supports the Creationist proposition, because you're concurring the that a Creator would be necessary. In terms of implyin evolution (which is incidently NO argument against creationism!!), scientist being able to create life or not is irrelavent!

no?

This discussion is now taking up several different threads... and there has not been a materialist view yet which has not talked itself into a dizzying circle.

Someone contend that... please... otherwise, I just cannot imagine what you're basing your disagreement with creationsits on.

Go ahead.. please.. I need to hear this.

If it wasn't created... WHAT happened?

And don't say the big bang... because something had to blow up.

And don't say some quantuum flux capacitor vacuum 21 gigiwatts shit... because that will still require something to EXIST.

If what we have was not created... then how did it get here.

Stumped?