>Like I mentioned, those companies are about providing service
>over their private networks. Their goal is to make that
>private network as valuable as profitable as possible.
>
>
>Also the cable business is better right now. The cable
>businesses largely don't compete against each other (the only
>time my cable company has changed in the last 20+ years has
>been when a smaller one was bought up by the larger ones). A
>satellite and DSL combo is the only real competition but it's
>severly hampered by accessibility issues (satellite isn't an
>optin if you don't have a southern exposure and DSL services
>have limited range).
>
>Company's in high barrier to entry industries usually avoid
>competing in low barrier markets.

so are you saying that cable companies will no t be effected by this? or are yo usaying that the govt should fill in the gaps that the cable companies dont reach so that everybody can have access?