>did i say i believed what buchannan wrote? im just trying to
>clarify what HE said. not what I said.

you said "well it was FDR and Churchill that signed those smaller nations over to stalin proclaiming they were free", so you obviously agree with what Buchanan wrote. Only problem is, they did not lose their freedom because FDR and Churchill signed them over to Stalin, Stalin already had them firmly in his grip. Which is why Buchanan's and your arguments are total bullshit.

>the title of his article is 'was world war 2 worth it.' ww2
>didnt become ww2 until the US got involved...

First that's a stupid definition. Second, do you recall how the US got involved in WWII? A little incident called Pearl Harbor, you might want to look it up.

------------------------------------------------------------
Now you know - and knowing is half the battle!