You could start another post, eh? I mean I'm not averse to disussing all that, but you completely ignored the need to RESPOND to what was just posted, the one you replied to, see, you didn't really reply to it.

Please express your argument for what was just posted, the thing you replied to.

As in... refute his point... no?


all you said was "I think moral constraints are bullshit"....

then nothing...

i'd wanna hear the fault you find in what was just posted... either that essay you replied to or that summarical a few posts back... that's what I'm hoping to hear... what you find fault with in that presentation... cause THAT'S the case for Moral Absolutism (scary word isn't it?)...

and saying "uh, it's not a strong case"... doesn't do much without qualifying your statement.



looking forward to it.


peace.