>i've met catholics that agree with my interpretation, and
>converted.

Well then they're not Catholics anymore. And there's still over a billion Catholics who disagree with your interpretation, so overall the odds are slightly against you.

>so what you're saying is that stereo-types are what most
>people care about. Well, I agree wholeheartedly... lol.

Uh, no... I'm saying that most people don't care about *your* stereotype of Catholics as pagan idolators.

>Osama is a Muslim. Jews are greedy. Blacks are lazy. Indians
>are drunks. That's all people care about. It's true... i'm
>trying to educate.

Osama being a Muslim isn't a stereotype, it's a fact - he's a bad Muslim IMO, but still a Muslim nonetheless.

>as far as no one agreeing, i can only hope you're open to my
>interpretations, because i know for a fact that i've opened
>some eyes on this post.

I'm open to your interpretations when they're based on facts instead of opinions.

>I've come to the Christian (a pagan term for our sector of
>Judaism) conclusion first as an atheist, then through
>prayer, then through scholastics. I cannot prove that I
>have the absolute truth. I can only believe it and
>rationalize it to the best of my ability. I don't really
>care what the secular opinion is of me...

And the majority of the world doesn't care about your opinion of them or others, which I believe was the original point.

and BTW, most Jews would take issue with you calling Christianity "our sector of Judaism" - do you care about their opinion on that, or do you also not care about what Jews (who you claim connection to) think of you?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"This will not stand, ya know, this aggression will not stand, man." - The Dude