>>In Catholicism, this is true.. but Jesus was immaculately
>>conceived.... i was just using the common terminology.. read
>>it again and tell me where i claimed that catholic doctine
>>of IC had anything to do with Jesus. I'm pretty sure I made
>>a distinction as to what was dotrine and what was not...
>>could've been a typo though... find a quote and post it so i
>>can at least acknowledge whatever mistake i made.
>
>regardless of what distinction you made, in common
>terminology "the Immaculate Conception" specifically refers
>to the Catholic doctrine on the conception of Mary - that's
>all Gyro and I were saying.

the distinction was in the comparison...

i know.. it is obvious by what i said that i know... that is, unless i made a mistake that you can prove otherwise, then i will recognize it and acknowledge it... otherwise, what the hell, alex trebeck?