>Old and infirm people, babies, pregnant women etc. Are not
>in a position to hunt meat, but still need nourishment. In
>terms of value, the meat is worth more, even though there is
>generally less of it available. This means that everyone
>must share (I cant remember if it was everything or just
>meat) they get equally, otherwise certain people would not
>eat meat. Not sharing your meat, is seen as an insult.

I understand the notion of what an insult IS. My question is still unanswered... where do we get the notion of INSULT? Of helping those in a position who need nourishment. More meat for us without morality, you know? So why is it there?