>>Fuck off. We're on two different levels of understanding
>what
>>this is about.
>
>...you're on the cave-dweller level (see the relevance now?)

more cheap insults.

>How about Subjective Christianity? I wont
>>engage in a bullshit argument when you can't or won't even
>>define the most basic of terms.

>Have you picked up nothing from these posts? IMO Christianity
>IS subjective, InVerse claims it is something more sacred than
>that.

I dont think Inverse is that clever either.

>And why the fuck would I want
>>to talk about a subject I know little or nothing about?
>
>
>You've made a lot of posts for an individual who wishes not to
>discuss something he knows nothing about.

I know nothing about Slavery...apart from the most basics of facts. I didnt study the History of Slavery, or Christianity because neither have any relevance to what I did study. But philosophy? analysis? reason? you dont need a degree to engage in a discussion...

>>your own fucking answers to your own fucking questions and
>>come back and tell us all about it...
>
>
>And would you be receptive? I already have answers that work
>for me, and I've been trying to hit them home for days.

no. Of course not, you're a charlatan and a liar.

>I had sincerely hoped you were brighter than this.
>
why?