Yesterday you stated that Barthes killed the author like Nietzsche killed God.

When I pressed you on his book you conceded that you hadn't read it, but liked the title!

After further exchange you stated that you had in fact read the book in art school but hadn't understood it.

You confess a superficial knowledge and yet you continue with a partisan line of argument!

I've told you before and I will re-iterate it: your semantic approximations do not constitute a cogent style. You are often no more coherent than Defendorf.

IMO your sig. should read; 'I'm not always wrong, but I'm not often right'!