>Because an "evil" Exploitative system only begets further evil
>acts...be that violence, exploitation, etc. etc. Now if I
>smacked you over the head with a shovel is an act of violence
>good? Might be good for me but it sure as shit isn't good for
>you.

EXACTLY!
So...

On what grounds does the person getting smacked over the head with the shovel tell the person doing the smacking that he SHOULDN'T. If it's "good" for the smacker, Why should he NOT do it?

If there is no REAL good (independent of both's opinions about shovel smacking), then to what standard does the person getting smacked appeal to in order to convince the smacker to stop!?