just never knew why
>they put so much stock in King James?


BUT...the premise, by most of the earliest theologians and older theologians of more contemporary times, is that the king james version was the closest in translation/transliteration from the original texts...

i think there is noway to be sure of the translations/transliterations....there is too much cultulrally that doesn't translate...so we can understand why the literal interpretations today are so off...

THE WORD is living and breathing..it grows and adapts...i'm suggesting that it changes but it does speak to all situations seen and unseen.