>May not be the exact age of the earth, however, it is a
>number that was arrived at by years and years of study, as
>opposed to your 10,000 yrs which were simply an idea created
>by a man with a pen.i will not conceded that it is a
>"theory"..and I will most certainly not conceded it to anyone
>who believes that the earth is but a mere 10,000 years old and
>cannot even explain something so simple as the existence of
>dinosaur fossils..


I tend to hold your viewpoint. However, you MUST concede that it is a theory, otherwise you completely contradict the point you are trying to make.