Some people just wont concede until they get empirical evidence. Then they put up or shut up.

"Give Me Yo GOD Fool, It's A Full Time Jack Move!"

So that leads me to this question. Do the original authors of religion/religious figures get their credit? If not then it smells like plagarisim. How can something that suppouse to be so "pure" be a copy of a copy of a copy?

Sounds like we need sampling laws in "religion."

Going back into my corner *singing* "Reasons, Reasons that were here."