>It’s not a point of knowing. The discussion is the jews of
>today are not the original jews. So if this area is to be the
>original area of the original jews, and the folks who are
>claiming Jewish today are not the original jews then they are
>not the original populations.

I understand the line of reasoning here, but it is being spoken of in this thread as a point of knowing.

>Furthermore if they
>non-original jews are so closely related to the other
>so-called semetic folks now inhabiting the area then they must
>be from the same area as the fake jews and are imposters
>themselves. Thus not the original population of that area.

But the "non-original jews" are from Europe, and the "so-called semitic folks" now inhabiting the Levant are supposedly all migrants from deep in the Arabian peninsula... so how are they from the same area?

>Who is to say they have gone anywhere? See Zewari’s recent
>post “Saudi king clinically dead” post#4. They are still
>there just not in power. (I wonder how many of these people
>the included in their tests)

If you're talking about the Nubians then yeah they're still there, but they were always located in upper Egypt. But what about the inhabitants of lower Egypt? Did the Arabs ethnically cleanse lower Egypt completely?

>>But the people who now call themselves Jews were in Europe
>for almost two thousand >years. How are they genetically
>related to the peoples occupying that area now if neither
>>population is originally from there?
>
>They migrated.

From where? When? To where?

>According to the bible jesus constantly
>referred to the ruling class of Judaism (the Pharisee) as
>being the children of the devil. “Ye are of your father the
>devil…” –Jn 8:44

Relevance?

>Also there were a lot of empires formed in that area by
>different peoples leading up to “the birth of jesus”.

So what does that prove?

>All this proves is that these people who now call themselves
>jews are closely related to the peoples occupying that area
>now genetically. The point is these are not the original
>population but migrants who have moved into the area and
>converted to these religions.

But the logical conclusion of this is that European Jews originate from deep in the Arabian peninsula or that Arabs originate from Europe. So unless that is what you're arguing, I don't understand what this is supposed to ultimately mean

>I am curious to know how
>closely, genetically, they are related to Afghanis and
>Pakistanis as well. Look how closely related they are to Turks
>and how close Saudi Arabians are to Europeans in that chart.

I haven't seen any studies on that. But the Saudis aren't really that close to the Europeans on that chart.


--------------------------------------------------------------
Nurse Roberts: She googled your ass.

Dr. Kelso: Don't you use your street lingo on me!