Go back to previous topic
Forum nameOkay Activist Archives
Topic subjectRE: it's more solid than any alternate theories provide
Topic URLhttp://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=22&topic_id=27708&mesg_id=28143
28143, RE: it's more solid than any alternate theories provide
Posted by Kozmikblak, Mon May-02-05 09:05 AM
>>So, with that said. The point that
>>is being made is that these folks are not the original
>>populations.

>None of them? How do you know that?

It’s not a point of knowing. The discussion is the jews of today are not the original jews. So if this area is to be the original area of the original jews, and the folks who are claiming Jewish today are not the original jews then they are not the original populations. Furthermore if they non-original jews are so closely related to the other so-called semetic folks now inhabiting the area then they must be from the same area as the fake jews and are imposters themselves. Thus not the original population of that area.

>>The arabs of Egypt are not the original
>>population of Egypt.

>So where did the original population of Egypt go?

Who is to say they have gone anywhere? See Zewari’s recent post “Saudi king clinically dead” post#4. They are still there just not in power. (I wonder how many of these people the included in their tests)

>>All this proves is that these people who now call themselves
>>jews are closely related to the peoples occupying that area
>>now genetically. The point is these are not the original
>>population but migrants who have moved into the area and
>>converted to these religions.

>But the people who now call themselves Jews were in Europe for almost two thousand >years. How are they genetically related to the peoples occupying that area now if neither >population is originally from there?

They migrated. According to the bible jesus constantly referred to the ruling class of Judaism (the Pharisee) as being the children of the devil. “Ye are of your father the devil…” –Jn 8:44

Also there were a lot of empires formed in that area by different peoples leading up to “the birth of jesus”.

>And I didn't present this as evidence of Jesus not being an African. But seeing as how >he was from the original population of that region, you would have to answer the above >question and explain why those populations are distinct from African populations.

All this proves is that these people who now call themselves jews are closely related to the peoples occupying that area now genetically. The point is these are not the original population but migrants who have moved into the area and converted to these religions. I am curious to know how closely, genetically, they are related to Afghanis and Pakistanis as well. Look how closely related they are to Turks and how close Saudi Arabians are to Europeans in that chart.

----------------------
"...you cats are undercover like GAY rappers dealing with MYSTERY." -Talib Kweli This means you, from Reflection Eternal

"I don't blame Tiger Woods, but I overstand the mental poison that's even worse than drugs" -nas poison