Sorry about the caps, but I was quite angry. Let me summarize my points.
There are many better analogies that can be used to explain Zionism, repeatedly calling zionists Nazis is disengenuous. This author uses typical, over the top anti-semetic wording to explain an event that should be able to stand on its own. He brings up the Protocols of the Elders of Zion which immediately invalidates everything he just said. As well, he doesn't make any distinction between Jews and Zionists. Look at the title. After a quick google search it seems he has a history of Jew-baiting and anti-semetic activity which makes his pro-Palestinian activities suspicious. Then again he's just a victim of the Jewish media right?

Here's some perspective on the author of that article, Ernesto Cienfuegos.

This is an article explaining some of cienfuegos' other passtimes, including publishing new editions of the protocols of the elders of zion.
http://www.joesabia.com/article/0051.html

This is where a rabbi calls Cienfuegos out for being a known anti-semite:
http://www.tzemachdovid.org/amechad/ernesto.shtml

Here's where Cienfuegos writes a hateful piece about a jewish real estate magnate:
http://satyricon20.tripod.com/sat45-runway69.htm

This is where he blames the beltway shootings on certain "zionist elements within the CIA": http://www.apfn.org/apfn/DC_sniper.htm


COULTER: Osama bin Laden is D-E-D
dead. No one can convince me
otherwise.

BIN LADEN: occupying himself by
talking to the little girl about the goat
and its butting was more important
than occupying himself with the
planes and their butting of the
skyscrapers.