>yet go on to argue that the above
>article's author is MORE comparable to the nazi party
>because of his mention of the Protocols of Zion.

HE'S USING THE BOOK THE NAZIS USED TO SCAPEGOAT THE EUROPEAN JEWS TO SCAPEGOAT MODERN DAY JEWS

The irony
>of your willingness to extend every benefit of the doubt to
>the Israeli state in saying that they are not comparable to
>the nazis while willing to jump at labeling the Aztlan and
>the article's auther as being more "nazi like" is
>astounding.

FUCK THE FASCIST ISRAELI STATE, ZIONISTS AND THEIR EVANGELICAL CHRISTIAN SUPPORTERS. FUCK LEFTISTS WHO CANT DISTINGUISH BETWEEN BLATANT ANTISEMIMITISM (IN A HISTORICAL EUROPEAN CONTEXT) AND VALID CRITICISM.

Furthermore, your comparison of the zionists
>with apartheid S. Africa as if apartheid S. Africa was
>incomparable to the nazis is even more mind numbing... and I
>think they relate your lack of understanding of apartheid S.
>Africa's brutality.

SOUTH AFRICA WAS BRUTAL, ISRAEL IS BRUTAL, THE NAZIS WERE BRUTAL, COLONIAL SPAIN WAS MORE BRUTAL AS WAS BRITAIN FRANCE AND THE FUCKING USA. TO CONTINUE TO HARP ABOUT THE ISRAELIS BEING NAZIS IS SO FUCKING NARROW MINDED ITS UNBELIEVABLE.

>2. The context in which the Protocols were mentioned was
>such that its AUTHENTICITY was not argued. The author wrote
>that the behavior and actions of zionists in Spain and
>Mexico falls in-line with the Protocols.

FUCK THE PROTOCOLS AND FUCK THE AUTHOR

While I don't doubt
>the protocols were used to PERPETUATE the demonization of
>Jews collectively, its significance with respect to actually
>INCITING hatred against the Jews is highly debatable.

WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE?

>Even the Ha'aretz, which is an Israeli paper, reported that
>the Iraq war was orchestrated by a group of 25
>neo-conservatives, most of whom are Jewish. Would you
>concede that zionist influences played a key role in the
>Iraqi genocide?

YES IT DOES, BUT IT IS A VERY MINOR INFLUENCE COMPARED TO THE ROLE OF THE NEO LIBERALS, CORPORATIONS, AND THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT. THIS IS CALLED SCAPEGOATING.

THE ARTICLE BRINGS UP SOME PERFECTLY REASONABLE ISSUES THAT SHOULD BE DISCUSSED; HOWEVER HE TOTALLY INVALIDATED HIS ARGUMENTS BY USING HISTORICALLY RACIST TERMINOLOGY. THATS MY ONLY POINT.

COULTER: Osama bin Laden is D-E-D
dead. No one can convince me
otherwise.

BIN LADEN: occupying himself by
talking to the little girl about the goat
and its butting was more important
than occupying himself with the
planes and their butting of the
skyscrapers.