You purposefully glanced over the discrepancy you perpetrated between acknowledgement and acceptance. I pointed it out to you- you dodged it.

"Discrimination law is based on a statutory and/or common law recognition of a group's existence."

Then you must agree that the court need only recognize the group's views and not adopt their ideology. Much like jews they can be recognized for their ideology but the courts are not obliged to accept that ideology. In the case of rac- the courts can acknowledge the racial ideology of the people in question but it does not need to accept that ideology nor encourage other people to go along with it.

DO YOU DISAGREE?

If the judge adopts the ideology of a defendant that is implicitly demeaning and discriminatory to Blacks then how could he ever be impartial. On this matter all you can demonstrate is the status quo and how it has led to a very disparaging judicial system in regards to how it handles Black people- this evidence doesnt make your claims look very good.

The courts dont do much good protecting us from discrimination as it is- as such going along with it is hardly a solution.


K