22731, spirit likes the yuck Posted by guest, Mon Jul-31-00 03:48 AM
>Again, you avoid the question. You >are avoiding the question of >the practical consequences of what >you are advocating. It's a >very interesting theory, but you >can't explain how it would >operate in practice.
I already have- getting you to understand such ideas is a different matter.
>>I think anyone who woould claim >>that they could provide labels >>that would prevent natural human >>problems is overstating their beliefs. > >I think a proposed "solution" that >doesn't deal with modern problems >isn't a solution. If you >can't explain how your proposed >solution will affect the problems >of now, you need to >work on your theory a >bit more.
YUCK- look it up. Just because you cant understand doesnt mean its not effective.
>>The difference between labels and culture >>whoever is that man chooses >>a label or has it >>imposed upon him- culture is >>something that people grow from >>not simply something that they >>would subscribe to. > >Ah, the cultural nationalist. The problem >with this theory is you >can choose to call yourself >whatever you want right now.
THATS WHAT IM ADVOCTAING AGAINST!!!!!!! Do you think we should be advocating anything different- yeah lets call ourselves whatever we want to nevermind what we really are. WHO NEEDS THE TRUTH.
>If you want to call >yourself a Koalian, you certainly >can. Just check "other" in >that Census box, chief.
Being obstinate only affirms the intelligence of one's own mind. Its like a private joke for one (but everybody else is laughing).
K
|