413, Rebuttal. Posted by HoChiGrimm, Thu Aug-12-04 06:47 AM
>japan didnt surrender though when askd twice. in the heat of >the war, it wouldnt make sense to give japan time to regroup >and maybe use a terrible weapon like the a-bomb on the >united states. you have to act quick and pound your enemy, >in this case the jap aggressor who started the whole thing, >into submission with minimul loss of your troops.
In the opinion of aformentioned Truman officials and military brass, it would've been impossible for Japan to regroup to the extent you're referring to.
Here's what we know:
- After the fall of the Mariana Islands, including Saipan, to the U.S. in July of 1944, the impending defeat of Japan became increasingly apparent to many Allied and Japanese leaders.
- The Marianas had been a key area within Japan's defense perimeter; now Japan would be within range of bombing runs from Pacific Ocean locations that were superior to the China bases that had been used for bombing missions (Akira Iriye, Power and Culture: The Japanese-American War, 1941-1945, pg. 174; Michael Sherry, The Rise of Am- erican Air Power, pg. 176).
- From November 1944 onward, Japan was the subject of nu- merous large-scale B-29 non-nuclear bombing raids (Robert Butow, Japan's Decision To Surrender, pg. 41). When Air Force chief General Hap Arnold asked in June 1945 when the war was going to end, the commander of the B-29 raids, General Curtis LeMay, told him September or October 1945, because by then they would have run out of industrial targets to bomb (Sherry, pg. 300 & 410(143n)).
- While Japan was being bombarded from the sky, a Naval blockade was strangling Japan's ability to import oil and other vital materials and its ability to produce war materials (Barton Bernstein, ed., The Atomic Bomb, pg. 54). Admiral William Leahy, the Chief of Staff to President Roosevelt and then to President Truman, wrote, "By the beginning of September, Japan was almost completely defeated through a practically complete sea and air blockade." (William Leahy, I Was There, pg. 259).
After the bombing, Admiral William D. Leary, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called the atomic bomb "a ba- rbarous weapon," also noting that: "The Japanese were alr- eady defeated and ready to surrender."
>but it was unknown how many japanese people would die from >an intesified bombing because it was unknown when the would >surrender.
That's not what top military officials believed. Based on intercepted messages,the Japan- ese were more than willing to surrender so long as the emperor retain his thrown. A conditional surrender was even put forth by Truman's advisors such as Joseph Grew and Henry Stimson, who argued that the surrender terms should be modified in order to bring a quick end to the war.
Moreover, an avalanche of archival documents released or discovered over the past decade -- including Truman's 'lost' diary and a series of revealing letters to his wife, Bess -- as Gar Alperovitz and Kai Bird point out in the 10 May 1993 issue of "The Nation" of New York, 'leaves no doubt that Truman knew the war would end "a year sooner now" and without an invasion'.
|