>>Humans ARE animals...

>Come on now, you think I
>don't know that? However, no
>one divides the human species
>into suubspecies in modern biology.

Right because modern biologists dont regard human categorzation through RACE.

>When the term "animal" is
>used in general language, it's
>used to refer to mammals
>and reptiles that are non-human...when
>is the last time you
>heard of an "animal rights"
>organization fighting for the rights
>of humans?

according to the same dictionary "animal" means

"A HUMAN BEING considered with respect to his or her physical, as opposed to spiritual, nature."

Its funny how you want us to observe the official definition but when you find out it doesnt support your claims we're supposed to regard "general language"


YUCK

K