>
>nope i asked questions- I dont
>remember seeing one in
>your post- you said specifically
>that I was an antagonist.
>Thats not questioning thats insulting.
>

you questioned, you poked, you proded, and antagonized. (woops...there i go insulting you again...i have to break myself out of that)

>
>>Well, then let the sparks fly,
>>baby. Because I am
>>kettle, just as you are
>>Black.
>
>Im Black and Im proud kid-
>you seem to have this
>thing for telling me what
>you think I am when
>Ive already made it quite
>clear. Koala- antagonistic that ish
>aint new- Im just saying
>if this thread was antagonism
>you aint seen nothin yet.
>

never questioned your blackness. but if this is nothing in comparison to upcoming antagonistic acts...then so be it.

>
>>>either way youve had absolutely nothing
>>>to offer this thread or
>>>the topic at hand- your
>>>posts here have been useless
>>>other than to deflect and
>>>distract the topics raised- to
>>>you I offer my most
>>>heartfelt YUCK
>>
>>you are right, koala. i
>>have not offered ANYTHING to
>>this topic or thread.
>>I never intended to do
>>so. My intent was
>>quite clear and that was
>>defend what appears to be
>>a public flogging of a
>>lone poster's opinion. Now
>>regarding your "YUCK", i gladly
>>accept it with warm and
>>open loving arms and send
>>and "I love you" to
>>you in its place.
>
>You dont love me CHUMP- I
>AM THE LOVE!
>

To quote some poster I read earlier:

"where did you get this from. Is this your opinion or is there some book that discusses..." where you are the love?

>>>now thats antagonistic
>>>
>>>K

are we done going back and forth on this now? i think we have said all that's needed to be said. you hate me, i love you...i'm sparky the kettle and your pot, the black antagonist who was in 'Nam...it's all over and done with...why are we still talking about it? can we argue about something else now?