that my original take was correct.

>"It was in response to sick
>mentality that negroes possess that
>could have been implied from
>your statement."
>
>"In reality for negroes it is
>the dilution of anything African
>which is the worst thing
>anyone can be."
>
>This is the message I was
>conveying.

this is the part I was referring to:

"I responded in that manner to see how many bootlickers condemn me to hell.

"negroes always show their true colors.

"white folks... well they are white folks..."

>I want people to show their
>true colors (or rather absence
>of it i.e. colorless "WE-ARE-the-Worldness").

In other words, you want to see who agrees with you and who doesn't. And anyone who doesn't is a bootlicker. Unless they are white. In which case they have nothing to add except perhaps amusement.


>1. Let negroes (bootlickers) reveal themselves.

i.e., those who disagree with you

>
>2. To have Afrikan warrior scholars
>step up.

i.e., those who agree with you

>3. To have lost souls find
>the WAY.

i.e., those who used to disagree with you but now agree with you. I see.

>
>I don't care what white folks
>think but it is always
>interesting (and funny) to hear
>their opinions.



>This is about nationbuilding AND nationdestroying.
>

I find it more and more difficult to take you seriously.

Peace.

There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about.
-- John von Neumann