>Cmon now, even you OkaySocialists gotta
>admit this is dirty.
>
>Pardoning an expatriate tax evading billionaire?

Um, why not pardon him? Because it doesn't meet YOUR standards?

>
>Pardoning his own brother, just so
>he can get right back
>in trouble with the law?
>
His brother had already served the time. The pardon was symbolic. I'll bet YOU'D pardon your brother too.


>Pardoning 4 more criminals in New
>York so Hillary can gain
>votes that she would have
>never gotten otherwise?

Can you prove that?? And by the way, to recieve a pardon you HAVE to have been a criminal, it's part of the defintion. See, you are accused/convicted of a CRIME then you a PARDONED for the offense. See??

>Clemency for a drug dealer that
>sent 800 llbs of cocaine
>to Minnesota to change it
>into crack and sell it
>on the streets?



>Clemency for a quack business man
>who was selling fraudulent products
>to people and evading taxes?


Again, the president has this power granted to him indirectly by the constituion and it has been upheld by both other branches of goverment. There are NO checks and balances on these. So he doesn't NEED YOUR PERMISSION to PARDON anyone. Does Cap Weinberger ring a bell??

>
>And I haven't even gone into
>the money side of it
>YET.
>
>After this scandal, along with ALL
>the other scandals that have
>occurred in the past 8
>years, you cannot say Clinton
>isn't a crook, and Hillary
>shouldn't have charges brought up
>and impeached for her involvement
>in these pardons.

Please PROVE that he is a crook. They have proven he is a LIAR on matters pertaining to INFIDELITY, but no crimes have been proven.

Just admit that NOTHING Bill Clinton can EVER do will satisy you. He is unredeemable and will burn in hell.

That's it, you just have to prove it. But to state as FACT some BULLSHIT (remember, its BULLSHIT until you PROVE IT), you are showing your lack of judgement.

And I'm the check AND balance.