>the virus is manufactured, and has
>been documented in cases going
>as far back as 1955
>by the CDC, this is
>on record.

alright..this is probably the easiest place to start picking. The CDC has records of the virus back in 1955...and your claim is that it is manufactured?! If by "manufactured" you mean it has been engineered, your own dates eliminate that possiblitiy. Genetic engineering of a disease like this BEFORE 55 would be nearly impossible. Add to that the fact that the mutation rate points to origins in the 20's. Even if you disregard all of that, you would have to find parent virii...genetic engineering doesn't CREATE, it ALTERS...no parent virii exist, so engineering isn't a plausible theory.

Now, if you were saying "manufactured" to mean it was FOUND (rather than created), and they determined they might be able to exploit it (like anthrax), you may have something.

>start digging.

already have...read all the previous posts. It is nice that you come with a stronger background than most of the previous posts, but the fact of the matter remains that there is a HUGE burden of proof that is still not being met.