16758, RE: I was talking to Posted by guest, Mon Mar-19-01 05:13 AM
>>>First of all, don't tell me >>>what I "obviously" do or >>>do not think. Check my >>>other posts. Especially the discussion >>>between Solarus and I. >> >>you need to relax a little. >>judging from all your posts >>on this topic you made >>it very obvious where you >>stood. if there is >>some conflict between what you >>posted here and in other >>threads then i think it's >>safe to say there is >>also some obvious confusion on >>your part. > >Paragon. And the reason I came >off like that is because >s/he doesn't seem to READ >before s/he responds at times. >I was just citing that >one should not be so >ready to make assumptions. > >There is no confusion. Or conflict. >I just don't adhere to >the "all cops are pigs" >or "they are here to >protect and serve us" extremes. >There are gray areas. Just >trying to balance the discussion >a little. > > >>it's nice that you clarified your >>earlier post, i can agree >>with some of it generally. >> as far as history, >>you might want to check >>out the history and development >>of the police itself. > >Paragon was arguing my reference to >"knuckleheads" and how they came >to be the way they >are. That's the "history" I >was referring to. >
na unh, that was me.
|