>>First of all, don't tell me
>>what I "obviously" do or
>>do not think. Check my
>>other posts. Especially the discussion
>>between Solarus and I.
>
>you need to relax a little.
>judging from all your posts
>on this topic you made
>it very obvious where you
>stood. if there is
>some conflict between what you
>posted here and in other
>threads then i think it's
>safe to say there is
>also some obvious confusion on
>your part.

Paragon. And the reason I came off like that is because s/he doesn't seem to READ before s/he responds at times. I was just citing that one should not be so ready to make assumptions.

There is no confusion. Or conflict. I just don't adhere to the "all cops are pigs" or "they are here to protect and serve us" extremes. There are gray areas. Just trying to balance the discussion a little.


>it's nice that you clarified your
>earlier post, i can agree
>with some of it generally.
> as far as history,
>you might want to check
>out the history and development
>of the police itself.

Paragon was arguing my reference to "knuckleheads" and how they came to be the way they are. That's the "history" I was referring to.

L.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Homer: Do you wanna change your name to Homer, Jr? All the kids can call you HoJo!
Bart: uhh...I'll get back to you...

"my mama said/a lady ain't what she wears/but what she knows"~~India Arie

Ignorance: The Verbal Airborne Disease" (c) my friend Ty