>the dumbass mother..

she's dumb for smoking/drinking while pregnant, but "exercising her rights" if she decides to kill her baby? if it's a "non-rights having" fetus, why should we be able to "force" her not to smoke/drink if that's her "choice"?

>...community
>pressure would be more effective

isn't that exactly what the bill is trying to instantiate? at least on a very high level?